Template:Principles of fitofazprocesses

Fitofazprocesses can teach us a lot about what consciousness and ixperiencitness is. To have principles about fitoprocesses you have to know which fitoprocesses does what. This takes experimentation and rational deduction from science as a whole and the experiments themselves. What we can do is outline the processes logically and deduce what should happen. The problem is that results seem illogical, in some cases, where as the steps in the process can seem straight forward and non changing of the consciousness produced.

Awaretheory asks the question what are all the different ways a fidentireplica can be made. A fidentireplica is a fragmented identireplica. Obviously, a fragmented identireplica is not a cidentireplica of an original because the structure and or functioning changes with fragmentation. It may be technologically impossible to create certain types of fidentireplicas but we can still consider the possible results and develop different theories depending of the different possible consequences.

The fitofazprocess is the grouping name for the fitoprocess, fitophysiprocess, fitophysaprocess, fitoneuroprocess, fitoawareprocess, fitomentaprocess, and fitoepiprocess.

A one type of simple fidentireplica is a human brain split where both sides of the brain is made to function as if they were still together. There are many processpaths that will produce this result. The process does not have to start with one brain. The two halves can be created from scratch separate from the beginning. The question is: is this different from splitting a brain in terms of the resulting consciousness and ixperiencitness produced? It is very likely that if the two halves of the brain have different structure and function for part of the process they will have or produce a different consciousness for this part of the process.

Principle 1. If two fitoprocesspaths are different but the resulting fidentireplicas' structure and functioning are identical they will produce the same consciousness and ixperiencitness as long as they continue to have the same physapaths.

Fragmentation can also apply to non biological systems like an isoidentireplica. We can imagine a computer having a different structure and still being able to run a computer program the same way. But can there be a conscious computer? Awaretheory predicts that a electronic or photonic device can be conscious if it is made with the same basic structure that a brain is. In other words using many neuron like processors that are connected to billions of other neuron like processors through trillions of possible synapse like (but electronic) interconnections. Then this device needs to be wired (or self wired through learning) in the right ways. This is not really what we consider as a computer. Computers should become complex enough that they can produce human like behavior.

If we consider a computer that produces human like behavior can we then change the structure of the computer where it will still be able to produce the same behavior? This we can test. The fitoconcept is that we can split or divide the consciousness and ixperiencitness producing part or parts of an itobody and still, in certain cases, produce consciousness and ixperiencitness.

If two halves of a brain will produce the same consciousness when spread apart by several feet will they also produce the same consciousness if you continue to separate them further and further apart?

Fitofazprocesses are technical processes because you are changing or creating specific structures and functionings of matter.