Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Identical or nearly identical

From Aware Theory

No two objects can be identical (it seems). To say that identical structure and functioning will produce identical behaviorpaths, awarepaths, and ixperiencitnesses is a true statement which means it corresponds to reality. But it is not likely that two complex physical objects can be identical because there are so many parts of a physical object that can make them different. We also know from our study of quantum mechanics the smaller we view matter and energy the less specific (or exacting) it structure and functioning appears to be.

The brain is so complex that if identity of structure and functioning of matter and energy was required for producing identity of [behaviorpaths]], awarepaths, and ixperiencitnesses there would be no duplication of them. Luckily, identity of structure and functioning is not necessary to produce identical behaviorpaths, awarepaths, ixperiencitness or ixpepaths.

The term “nearly identical” is used as a term to demote a grouping of [[physipaths] and physapaths and neuropaths that can produce the same awarepath and ixperiencitness.

A neidentireplica is a nearly identical replica. It is a type of itoidentireplica or videntireplica that produces a nearly identical neuropath and by definition an identical awarepath and ixperiencitness. As a general rule and prediction, for every original (conscious being or human) there is an extremely large amount of potential nidentireplicas that can exist throughout space and time.

A clidentireplica is a closely identical replica. By definition it is a type of videntireeplica that produces a different physapath and awarepath than the original but the same ixperiencitness. For every person there are an enumerable number of potential clidentireplica that can exist throughout space and time.

A neidentireplica is a member of the set of clidentireplicas because a nidentireplica can produce the same ixperiencitness as the original does which makes it by definition a clidentireplica. However, a clidentireplica is not necessarily a nidentireplica because many clidentireplicas do not produce the same awarepath as the original does.

A neidentireplica is different from a nidentireplica because a nidentireplica is a type of itoidentireplica that has an identical neuropath but the rest of the physapath can be different. An identical neuropath will produce the same awarepath and ixperiencitness as the original person’s body did.