Proof sequence 1a

Proof sequence 1a - Identical structures and functionings of matter produce identical behaviors.

What does this statement mean?

It might be argued that the structure and functioning of matter is identical to the behavior that matter produces but it is more complex than that. There is the behavior of the individual atoms that are composed of the behavior of subatomic particles and energy. Then there are the behavior of molecules and cells and of combinations of cells and organs to the complete behavior of a body. Each level of complexity adds unique elements of behavior that were not at individual aspects at lower levels. For example, you see no evidence of speech at the atomic, molecular, cellular, levels of complexity. The combination of the properties of matter at each successive level of complexity adds up to properties like consciousness and what sounds the body as a whole makes which gives insight into the consciousness produced by this body. The combination of all the lower levels of structure and functioning of matter or behavior of matter add up to the most complex and highest levels of behavior like motion of the body for deliberate actions and self identity through speech.

Why is this concept, principle, prediction important?

Proof sequence1a for the principle that: Identical structures and functionings of matter produce identical behaviors.

Supporting evidence for 1a is as follows

Experiments supporting principle 1a:

How changes in the matter used in the experiment effects principle 1a.
How changes in time period that the experiment is carried out in effects principle 1a.
How changes in place that the experiment is carried out in effects principle 1a.
How changes in orientation of the matter used in the experiment effects principle 1a.
How changes in previous use of matter used in the experiment effects principle 1a.
How changes in continuity of the consciousness produced by the body effects principle 1a.
How changes in continuousness of body used in the experiment effects principle 1a.
How changes in the experiment due to the effects of the predictions of Quantum Mechanics effects principle 1a.

How do these changes effect memories, self identity, feeling, emotions, desires, actions, fears, empathy, sadness, happiness, depression, motivation, abilities, understanding of different languages, knowledge of self, knowledge of others, knowledge of things, beliefs, etc.

Changes to experiments giving extra evidence for principle 1a

Repeating experiments with different questions
Repeating experiments with different environmental conditions
Repeating experiments with different input to the senses
Repeating experiments these experiments at different point in the life of the person.

Falsifiability experiments for principle 1a

Falsifiability argument for principle 1a principle 1a is falsifiable because the behavior could be different when there is identical structure and functioning functioning because of breaking of natural laws or that between levels of complexity there can be more than one mapping to a higher level. For example under the exact same conditions the same molecule acts differently.

Lack of disproving evidence for 1a --- lack of disproving experiments, lack of disproving experiments with other types of higher level behaviors coming from lower level properties

First experiment arguments for behavior First experiment argument for proposition 1a First experiment argument for proposition 1b First experiment argument for proposition 1c First experiment argument for proposition 1d First experiment argument for proposition 1e First experiment argument for proposition 1f

Simplicity argument for principle 1a show why simplest theory by showing that the alternatives are not as simple.
Usefulness argument for principle 1a show why more or most useful principle by showing alternatives that are not useful or not as useful.
Explainability argument for principle 1a show why more or most explainable principle by showing alternatives that are not explainable or not as explainable.
Understandability argument for principle 1a show why more or most understandable principle by showing alternatives that are not understandable or not as understandable.
Predictability argument for principle 1a show why more or most predictable principle by showing alternatives that are not predictable or not as predictable.

Coherence of with science argument for principle 1a Coherence with science, means that the principle does not contradict any scientific principles.
Coherence argument for principle 1a --- no internal contradictions
Natural argument for principle 1a principle 1a is not supernatural or rely on any supernatural phenomena to make it true.

Analogies argument for principle 1a the body is a physical object it should behave like: processes of manufacturing, experiments, biological objects, electronic devices, TVs, computers, robots of ever increasing complexity. There are numerous examples of this principle being true for all physical objects.

Analogies experiments for principle 1a with the above
changes in matter
changes in time
changes in place
changes in orientation
changes in previous use of matter
changes in continuity
changes in continuousness of the device TV computer etc.
how do these changes effect the show, computer program, robot behavior.

Analogies for Simplicity argument for principle 1a Show why simplest theory by showing alternatives that are not simple.
Analogies for Usefulness argument for principle 1a Show why more or most useful principle by showing alternatives that are not useful or not as useful
Analogies for Explainability argument for principle 1a Show why more or most understandable principle by showing alternatives that are not understandable or not as understandable
Analogies for Predictability argument for principle 1a show why more or most predictable principle by showing alternatives that are not predictable or not as predictable.
Analogies for Understandability argument for principle 1a show why more or most understandable principle by showing alternatives that are not understandable or not as understandable.

Analogies for Coherence of with science argument for principle 1a Coherence with science Analogies do not contradict any scientific principles
Analogies for Coherence argument for principle 1a --- Analogous principles contain no internal contradictions
Analogies for Natural versus supernatural argument for principle 1a Analogous principles contain no supernatural processes or objects.

Contradictions with the inverse statement: Identical structures and functionings of matter will not produce identical behaviors.

Falsifiability of not 1a --- It is not the case that Identical structures and functionings of matter will produce identical behaviors.

Under what circumstances will it not be true that identical structures and functionings of matter does not produce identical behaviors.--- when supernatural effects like magic are involved. When the laws of nature are broken.