Difference between revisions of "Sin and awaretheory"
(Created page with "Awaretheory predicts that awarepaths can exist and be produced that contain what religions define as sinful behavior without ever effecting reality or other conscious ...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In an [[awarepaducer]] any number of sinful [[awarepaths]] can be produced that have the same [[ixperiencitness]] as the [[original sinful person]] | In an [[awarepaducer]] any number of sinful [[awarepaths]] can be produced that have the same [[ixperiencitness]] as the [[original sinful person]] | ||
| − | Is a sinful itobody as bad as a sinful itocomponent? Can a [[physapaducer]] give or allow the [[awarepaths]] that it creates free will? It can be that the [[physapaducer]] is not aware of what awarepaths will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the [[physapaths]]. | + | Is a [[sinful itobody]] as bad as a [[sinful itocomponent]]? Can a [[physapaducer]] give or allow the [[awarepaths]] that it creates free will? It can be that the [[physapaducer]] is not aware of what [[awarepaths]] will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the [[physapaths]]. |
| − | Is it a sin to produce this sinful awarepath that does no actual sinful action. How do you punish an awarepath that has contained? | + | Is it a sin to produce this [[sinful awarepath]] that does no actual [[sinful action]]. How do you punish an [[awarepath]] that has contained within it a [[consciousness]] of a sinful behavior? Assuming some one like hitler is sinful and should be punished because he was responsible for the death and suffering of many people. Awaretheory predicts that if you replicate the [[neuropath]] or [[physapath]] of Hitler you will get not only his exact consciousness but also the same [[ixperiencitness]] that he experienced in his life. Is it a sin to recreate this sinful awarepath? You could proceed to start punishing this [[awarepath]] at any point in his life. You could start punishing him before he ever did these evil things. He clearly would end up living a different life from then on thus a different [[awarepath]] would be produced. But it could still have the same [[ixperiencitness]]. If this new [[awarepath]] (of Hitler) never did these evil things nor experienced doing these evil things was he then still responsible for these evil things? |
| + | Suppose that the evil hitler never existed. [[Awaretheory]] predicts that the evil hitler's [[awarepath]] could still be produced in an [[awarepaducer]] even if there was never an actual evil hitler. Is this action sinful. Since religion defines the word "sinful" they would have to make the decision as to whether doing this is a sin. A religion might say that creating any [[awarepath]] outside of a huma body is a sin. Where is their authority, for this view point because it does not come up in religious books? | ||
| − | + | Often it is said by religious individuals that just the thought of a sinful act is a sinful act. Is a person that thought about killing someone else as sinful as someone that did in fact actually kill some one else? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Often it is said by religious individuals that just the | + | |
Is it a sin if a | Is it a sin if a | ||
Revision as of 20:28, 17 January 2013
Awaretheory predicts that awarepaths can exist and be produced that contain what religions define as sinful behavior without ever effecting reality or other conscious beings. Thus it is not a sinful act or behavior.
In an awarepaducer any number of sinful awarepaths can be produced that have the same ixperiencitness as the original sinful person
Is a sinful itobody as bad as a sinful itocomponent? Can a physapaducer give or allow the awarepaths that it creates free will? It can be that the physapaducer is not aware of what awarepaths will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the physapaths.
Is it a sin to produce this sinful awarepath that does no actual sinful action. How do you punish an awarepath that has contained within it a consciousness of a sinful behavior? Assuming some one like hitler is sinful and should be punished because he was responsible for the death and suffering of many people. Awaretheory predicts that if you replicate the neuropath or physapath of Hitler you will get not only his exact consciousness but also the same ixperiencitness that he experienced in his life. Is it a sin to recreate this sinful awarepath? You could proceed to start punishing this awarepath at any point in his life. You could start punishing him before he ever did these evil things. He clearly would end up living a different life from then on thus a different awarepath would be produced. But it could still have the same ixperiencitness. If this new awarepath (of Hitler) never did these evil things nor experienced doing these evil things was he then still responsible for these evil things? Suppose that the evil hitler never existed. Awaretheory predicts that the evil hitler's awarepath could still be produced in an awarepaducer even if there was never an actual evil hitler. Is this action sinful. Since religion defines the word "sinful" they would have to make the decision as to whether doing this is a sin. A religion might say that creating any awarepath outside of a huma body is a sin. Where is their authority, for this view point because it does not come up in religious books?
Often it is said by religious individuals that just the thought of a sinful act is a sinful act. Is a person that thought about killing someone else as sinful as someone that did in fact actually kill some one else?
Is it a sin if a
A conscious being can commit what realigion says is a sin
can exist with out effecting reality
Because religion are not complex enough, they have not dealt with these ideas that develop from the ideas of awaretheory. When they do they will creating more different types of awarepaths.
