Sin and awaretheory

Awaretheory predicts that awarepaths can exist and be produced that contain what religions define as sinful behavior without ever effecting reality or other conscious beings. Thus it is not a sinful act or behavior.

In an awarepaducer any number of sinful awarepaths can be produced that have the same ixperiencitness as the original sinful person

Is a sinful itobody as bad as a sinful itocomponent? Can a physapaducer give or allow the awarepaths that it creates free will? It can be that the physapaducer is not aware of what awarepaths will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the physapaths.

Is it a sin to produce this sinful awarepath that does no actual sinful action. How do you punish an awarepath that has contained within it a consciousness of a sinful behavior? Assuming some one like hitler is sinful and should be punished because he was responsible for the death and suffering of many people. Awaretheory predicts that if you replicate the neuropath or physapath of Hitler you will get not only his exact consciousness but also the same ixperiencitness that he experienced in his life. Is it a sin to recreate this sinful awarepath? You could proceed to start punishing this awarepath at any point in his life. You could start punishing him before he ever did these evil things. He clearly would end up living a different life from then on thus a different awarepath would be produced. But it could still have the same ixperiencitness. If this new awarepath (of Hitler) never did these evil things nor experienced doing these evil things was he then still responsible for these evil things? Suppose that the evil hitler never existed. Awaretheory predicts that the evil hitler's awarepath could still be produced in an awarepaducer even if there was never an actual evil hitler. Is this action sinful. Since religion defines the word "sinful" they would have to make the decision as to whether doing this is a sin. A religion might say that creating any awarepath outside of a huma body is a sin. Where is their authority, for this view point because it does not come up in religious books?

Often it is said by religious individuals that just the thought of a sinful act is a sinful act. Is a person that thought about killing someone else as sinful as someone that did in fact actually kill some one else?

Is it a sin if a

A conscious being can commit what realigion says is a sin

can exist with out effecting reality

Because religion are not complex enough, they have not dealt with these ideas that develop from the ideas of awaretheory. When they do they will creating more different types of awarepaths.

The problems with religions is that they want all awarepaths to be religious awarepaths and only their religious type of awarepaths. Awaretheory predicts that this type of religious awariverse can be created but it has to be created within a more comprehensive awariverse where science bases it as close as possible or as close as needed on the ultimate reality (technoverse). Belief systems (including religious belief systems) that are not adaptable enough eventual die out thus no more of those type of awarepaths are produced. The universe can repeat itself in recreating the same type of conditions that produce a religion in the first place. But because of the amount of variety of belief systems that can be created it is not likely that in this universe the exact same religion will be produced again naturally.