Itomultiplicity arguments
More actions
Itomultiplicity arguments are based on showing that other itobodies have the same ixperiencitness as their corresponding originals do at the same time. There are many different arguments for itomultiplicity, from scientific arguments based on actual experiments to philosophical arguments based on moral grounds.
Some Itomultiplicity arguments show that the anti itomultiplicity arguments are unscientific, incoherent, supernatural, or just irrational.
The first part of the argument is showing that a specific ixperiencitness can exist for longer than an awaremoment. Personal experience is the proof of this we think that our ixperiencitness covers more time than just an awaremoment. Most people think that it covers their life and beyond.
The second part of the argument is showing that the ixperiencitness can exist for more than one awarepath that is not at the same time. In other words a specific ixperiencitness is not necessarily tied to a specific awarepath; you could have or would have experienced something different if your externapath and or sensepath would have been different.
The biggest objection to itomultiplicity is that: If it is not part of my current consciousness then it is not me or my ixperiencitness. It is me if I experience it.
It is me if I experience it, does not require every consciousness that I experience to exist at once. And secondly it does not require me to be aware of the other consciousnesses that I will or have experienced in the past.
Arguments against itomultiplicity believe that there is something unique about the time factor or progression factor so any future or past experiences in our awarepath (consciousness) can be part of our ixperiencitness but any current, although identical consciousness will have a different ixperiencitness.
What is this special condition of time or progression and does it really exist and effect itomultiplicity. Some have said that it is based on matter but there are many arguments that show that different matter can produce the same ixperiencitness see: n-cidentireplica arguments.