Conparitor
More actions
Conparitor is a word made from the words conscious and compare. This word means a conscious being that can actually see and compare the consciousness of two or more different conscious beings. It actually experiences a version of what both the experiencee’s experience. It then can report what they are actually experiencing because it is actually experiencing exactly the same thing as the experiencee or an accurate modified version of it. It can give a verbal report such as they are experiencing things exactly alike or very differently. They can say that these part of the awarepaths are exactly the same or that they are slightly different. They can report that experiencee #1 is experiencing the color blue slightly differently than experiencee #2. They can give exact numbers to this difference such as experiencee 1 color blue is 6.0089 and experiencee 2 color blue is 6.00891 at this specific time or awarepoint on the awarepath. Thus it can report booth subjectively and objectively. It can be based on many different person’s (originals) consciousnesses. So you at his minute could experience being a conparitor. Or you could experience it at any other time in your life. Being conparitors produce awarepaths or awaresections that are part of your potential awarevenue.
How do you make a conparitor? There are as many ways to make a conparitor as there are to connect three or more brains or conscious producing systems together. But only some types of connections will give accurate comparisons and subjective and objective understandings. When certain types of brain functioning occurs it stimulates a connection to the brain that is observing. It could be between every neuron but then there would be so much information coming into the observing brain that the brain would have to be much more complex to process this information a superphysipath. It is possible to set it up so that the information coming in is like the senses. You see what one is seeing through one eye and what the other sees through the other eye. Or it is like having two tv screens that you are viewing at the same time, There are many possible scenarios.
When certain things happen in the observee's brain there is a direct connection to the observer brain (conparitor brain) that stimulates a change in the consciousness there. there does not have to be separate brain or physipaths, they can be musidentireplicas or insidentireplicas that create the relationship.
Problems with conparitors and conalyzers
An argument against using conalyzers and comparitors in understanding and comparing consciousness on a subjective level is that the results will vary so much depending on the way the conparitor and conalyzer are connected to the different conscious subjects that there will be conflicting results. This assumes that we can not find the best ways to analyze the conscious subjects for specific purposes. Through repeated experimentation we can determine the best ways to compare and analyze consciousness subjectively with out bias. Can you actually trust the results of a conalyzer or conparitor? As there are lying human there certainly can be lying comparitors and conalyzers. But this does not mean that all will be this way. There is the potential for conscious beings to actually see the consciousness in another person and then correctly report what he sees. There are many ways to report what he experiences. Words spoken or written are only two ways of reporting. Other complex analysis of the conparitor functioning and or behavior can serve the same purpose.
There is also the assumption that you can never compare theixperiencit concept. But does this not make it a supernatural concept beyond consciousness itself?
Is it ethical to create a conscious beings for the purpose of studying conscious existence and identity in other conscious beings? Because of the concepts of enhancement, divergence and transformation, comparitors and conalyzers can be just versions of us. As such we should care about the consciousness that are produced by them so that they do not suffer and in fact have a happy and good life. The question is, can they have a happy and good life doing scientific subjective analysis of other conscious beings? There are so many different versions of consciousness that can apply to comparitors and conalyzers that there will be very happy ones and to the other extreme that or being very unhappy. The reason that this can work is that not every consciousness has to experience the same thing to be content. The sfmc theory seems to encourage variety in consciousnesses. The consciousness produced by conparitors is one of the different types. When people say that you should not create other consciousnesses, only god should, they have to prove not only that there is a god but that this god wants there to be these specific moral rules and that there are no other gods that actually want these events to happen.
Another critism is that the conscious is actually not experieced by the conalyzer. The varying connections can form many different consciousness awarepaths in the conanalyer that will have nothing to do with the original consciousness.