Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Enumerably large

From Aware Theory

The phrase enumerably large when applied to a number is a number that is not infinite but still extremely large. The amount of this number does not have to be known exactly. This number can be orders of magnitude different in predicted size than actual size. There may not be an exact way to calculate this number because of the variables involved are not know exactly. But these composite numbers are known or are predicted to produce large numbers. For example, The number of atoms in the universe that we can see is not infinite but is enumerably large. We know this because the numbers used to calculate this number by multiplication are also enumerable large. One calculation can be gained by multiplying the average number of atoms in a pound of matter. Times the average weight of a star, times the average number of stars in a galaxy. Times the number of galaxies in the known universe.

The science of superimmortality and the ixperiencit theory of consciousness uses the term enumerably large to define many different numbers. An enumerably large number of some type or subgroup of itofazpath may nonetheless be a very small part of another type or grouping of itofazpath. For example, all of the physipaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness is a much larger set than the set of physapaths that produce the same ixperiencitness. Both usually can be called enumerably large sets.


A few examples are:

1. The number of different physipaths that will produce the same behaviorpaths.

The number of different physipaths that will produce the same awarepath.

2. The number of different physipaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

3. The number of different physipaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.

4. The number of different physipaths that will produce the same physapaths.


. The number of different physapaths that will produce the same behaviorpaths.

. The number of different physapaths that will produce the same awarepath.

. The number of different physapaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

. The number of different physapaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.

. The number of different physapaths that will produce the same awarepath.


4. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same behaviorpaths.

1. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same awarepath.

2. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

3. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.


4. The number of different awarepaths that will correspond to the same behaviorpaths.

1. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same awarepath.

2. The number of different awarepaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

3. The number of different awarepaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.

4. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same awarepath.


4. The number of different externapaths that will help produce the same behaviorpaths.

1. The number of different externapaths that will produce the same awarepath.

2. The number of different externapaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

3. The number of different externapaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.


. The number of different enviropaths that will produce the same behaviorpaths.

. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same awarepath.

. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same ixpepath.

. The number of different sensepaths that will produce the same ixperiencitness.


The number of physipoints on a physisection


the number of ways that a physipath can diverge into a different path from a