Quondamality proof: Difference between revisions
More actions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[quondamality proof]] is the proof that a conscious being (human being) that has existed in the past can consciously exist again in the present. | The [[quondamality proof]] is the proof that a conscious being (human being) that has existed in the past can consciously exist again in the present. | ||
The [[quondamality proof]] is based on the fact that identical [[physapaths]] and [[neuropaths]] produce identical [[awarepaths]] and [[ixpepaths]]. A previously existing person is the [[first experiment]] into what a specific [[physapath]] will produce in terms of [[awarepaths]] and [[ixpepaths]]. | The [[quondamality proof]] is based on the fact and principle that identical [[physapaths]] and [[neuropaths]] produce identical [[awarepaths]] and [[ixpepaths]]. A previously existing person is the [[first experiment]] into what a specific [[physapath]] will produce in terms of [[awarepaths]] and [[ixpepaths]]. Tt is reasonable to assume if the necessary conditions are met in another [[physapath]] or [[neuropath]] then the same [[awarepaths]] and [[ixpepath]] will be produced. Rational and actual [[multicid]] and [[multivid experiments]] give extra proof. there are many other arguments that support [[simplicity argument]] [[technology argument]] [[knowledge argument]], [[production argument]], [[science argument]], [[coherence with science argument]], [[experimental argument]], [[falsifyable argument]]. | ||
See also: [[quondamality proof]], [[multiquondamality proof]], [[diquondamality proof]], [[dimultiquondamality proof]] | See also: [[quondamality proof]], [[multiquondamality proof]], [[diquondamality proof]], [[dimultiquondamality proof]] | ||
Revision as of 03:19, 11 March 2014
The quondamality proof is the proof that a conscious being (human being) that has existed in the past can consciously exist again in the present.
The quondamality proof is based on the fact and principle that identical physapaths and neuropaths produce identical awarepaths and ixpepaths. A previously existing person is the first experiment into what a specific physapath will produce in terms of awarepaths and ixpepaths. Tt is reasonable to assume if the necessary conditions are met in another physapath or neuropath then the same awarepaths and ixpepath will be produced. Rational and actual multicid and multivid experiments give extra proof. there are many other arguments that support simplicity argument technology argument knowledge argument, production argument, science argument, coherence with science argument, experimental argument, falsifyable argument.
See also: quondamality proof, multiquondamality proof, diquondamality proof, dimultiquondamality proof