View source for Sin and awaretheory

[[Awaretheory]] predicts that [[awarepaths]] can exist and be produced that contain what religions define as sinful behavior without ever effecting reality or other conscious beings. Thus it is not a sinful act or behavior. 


In an [[awarepaducer]] any number of sinful [[awarepaths]] can be produced that have the same [[ixperiencitness]] as the [[original sinful person]]

Is a [[sinful itobody]] as bad as a [[sinful itocomponent]]? Can a [[physapaducer]] give or allow the [[awarepaths]] that it creates free will? It can be that the [[physapaducer]] is not aware of what [[awarepaths]] will be produced until after they actually ocurr. But they will add direction and a starting point for the [[physapaths]].

Is it a sin to produce this [[sinful awarepath]] that does no actual [[sinful action]]. How do you punish an [[awarepath]] that has contained within it a [[consciousness]] of a sinful behavior? Assuming some one like hitler is sinful and should be punished because he was responsible for the death and suffering of many people. Awaretheory predicts that if you replicate the [[neuropath]] or [[physapath]] of Hitler you will get not only his exact consciousness but also the same [[ixperiencitness]] that he experienced in his life. Is it a sin to recreate this sinful awarepath? You could proceed to start punishing this [[awarepath]] at any point in his life. You could start punishing him before he ever did these evil things. He clearly would end up living a different life from then on thus a different [[awarepath]] would be produced. But it could still have the same [[ixperiencitness]]. If this new [[awarepath]] (of Hitler) never did these evil things nor experienced doing these evil things was he then still responsible for these evil things?
Suppose that the evil hitler never existed. [[Awaretheory]] predicts that the evil hitler's [[awarepath]] could still be produced in an [[awarepaducer]] even if there was never an actual evil hitler. Is this action sinful. Since religion defines the word "sinful" they would have to make the decision as to whether doing this is a sin. A religion might say that creating any [[awarepath]] outside of a huma body is a sin. Where is their authority, for this view point because it does not come up in religious books?

Often it is said by religious individuals that just the thought of a sinful act is a sinful act. Is a person that thought about killing someone else as sinful as someone that did in fact actually kill some one else?

Is it a sin if a 

A conscious being can commit what realigion says is a sin 

can exist with out effecting reality


Because religion are not complex enough, they have not dealt with these ideas that develop from the ideas of [[awaretheory]]. When they do they will creating more different types of awarepaths.


The problems with religions is that they want all [[awarepath]]s to be religious [[awarepaths]] and only their religious type of [[awarepaths]]. [[Awaretheory]] predicts that this type of religious [[awariverse]] can be created but it has to be created within a more comprehensive [[awariverse]] where science bases it as close as possible or as close as needed on the [[ultimate reality]] ([[technoverse]]). [[Belief systems]] (including religious belief systems) that are not adaptable enough eventual die out thus no more of those type of [[awarepaths]] are produced. The universe can repeat itself in recreating the same type of conditions that produce a religion in the first place. But because of the amount of variety of belief systems that can be created it is not likely that in this universe the exact same religion will be produced again naturally.