Repetitions with in changes in spacial orientation

Repetitions with Changes in Spacial Orientation

Introduction
Definition: Orientation of a body refers to it being up or down, sideways, spinning in one direction or another or even vibrating.
Question: How does changes in spacial orientation of the human body, before a repetition of a human physasection previously produced by that body, effect the awaresection, and ixperiencitness produced by that body during that repetition?

Repetition (with Changes in Spacial Orientation) Principle for Humans: When human physasections are repeated in any different sequence of orientations throughout space and time they will produce the same awarepath and ixperiencitness.
Experimental Evidence: If the movement of the body, as in acceleration, vibration, or spinning, etc., is severe enough it will change the structure and functioning of the body, thus producing a different awarepath or none at all if the violent movement causes death.
Rational Evidence: A repetition of the same physapath or close enough approximation of the physapath produces the same behaviorpath.
Predictions based on this principle: When the orientationpath during a repetition does not change the physapath of a conscious body, then the same awarepath and ixpepath produced in the repetition will be the same The orientationpath
Importance of the principle: This principle increases the likelihood that a human body will produce, in a repetition, the same awaresection and ixperiencitness without identical physisections being produced. It simplifies a complex part of reality. Adds to the scientific predictability, understanding, and explainability of consciousness and ixperiencitness. Personally, it increases the likelihood that you will experience conscious existence again after death and have some control over which awarepaths will be produced in the future.
Specific example: Your spacial orientation as you travel through space is constantly changing. Any sequence of spacial orientations that did not change your physapath beyond certain tolerances would have produced the same awarepath and ixperiencitness.

Analogous Question: How does changes in spacial orientation of the TV, before a repetition, effect the TV physapath, showpath, and selfpath produced by that TV?
Repetition Analogy (with Changes in Spacial Orientation) Analogous Principle for TVs: If a previous functioning is produced by the same TV then the same showpath will be produced that was produced at that previous time.
Experimental Evidence: A number of experiments can be and are inadvertently carried out where the orientation of the TV is changed. Because of the rotation of the earth the absolute orientation of the TV is constantly changing.
Rational Arguments: If turning the TV upside down made the TV produce a different showpath without changing the structure or functioning of the TV,
Simplicity versus Complexity Argument for space orientation: If spacial orientation changed the showpath produced by the TV without changing the TV's physapath If there is an increase of just two possible showpaths produced by one physapath then there is more than double the complexity to explain and predict why one TV physapath produces two different showpaths. Either the outcome is random where the result is a loss of predictability or there has to be other apparently hidden factors that effect the outcome where understanding and explainability are greatly decreased.
Predictions based on this principle: If the sequence of spacial orientations of the TV alone is different it will still repeat the same showpath any number of times.
Specific example

To see the list of experiments/ arguments / principles of this type go to Repetition experiments and their analogies, and Replication experiments and their analogies. For more arguments for superimmortality see: Superimmortality arguments