Itotheory applied to gods

File name: itotheory applied to gods Time created:01:45:40 PM & Date: 03/17/09

Considering the limited nature of the gods of religions the superpaths of this theory or much more godly even if they are limited in scope. For instance, we are made in god imagine that makes god limited. Doing gods work means that he can not do what ever in an instance. Having free will and not being perfect means that god does not have the knowledge and power to give people free will and perfection. Having a devil and angels means that god is limited in his powers to do things. God not living in the future or past is another limit to him. If he was in the past and the future at the same time he could start the path of humanity on the one or several paths that leads to the perfect path and he could make if necessary all the very small changes that need to be made at the perfect time with out having things go wrong all the time. Another thing is god needing mans love and praise this seem strange makes him a needed person not a god because this mean that he has need that he can not fulfill with the snap of the finger he went to all the trouble to make people that he want to love and praise him where he could have just snapped his finger and had the exact same feelings. If he can not do this or ever needs anything this means that he is very limited

With logical thinking and rationality we can over come the toxic religions and replace them with positive ideas showing how limited their god is is one way. People want a stronger god they feel safer with a stronger god. They also want a nicer god. This theory allows for stronger nicer rational non vindictive gods. It also allows you to share in this godness through the enhancement process and the superawarecontinuum. the superawarecontinuum is the potential awarecontinuum that is all about superawarepaths.

The concepts of actual and potential awaremoments, awarepath, awarevenues, and awarecontinuums, apply to gods too. We can ask the same question about gods as we do about people. Are they a thing or body or they a consciousness? Do they have a soul that is independent of a consciousness? Imagine a god that is not conscious?

Imagine a god that is not consciousness what then makes him make decisions Just the function of his body? He would then be a zombie god. I do not think that we would like our gods to be zombie. How would we know why or how they are making their decisions? We do want a conscious god? We want his to be aware and make decisions based on that awareness.

Awareness is always limited. Is not the simple act of a nerve caring a signal awareness. Imagine a very simple organism that has one nerve and when touched that nerve fires. Is this not awareness? There is the event and there is the meaning of the event. There is the nerve firing and there is the meaning of the nerve firing. How are the meaning of that nerve firing changed? Is it change by internal means or external means? The meaning of a nerve firing can not be changed by internal means it has to be changed by external means. As the external changes the internal meaning changes. But how far does that external effect apply? Is there a limit to the space is there a limit to the time. These are key question to the fitoprocess. Does this change or add. This can be an additive or multiplicative process. A single nerve firing does not loose it initial meaning as the environment changes it gains meaning. So as you build a larger and larger structure of nerves around this particular nerve and it behavior over time its original meaning stays the same but there is extra meaning added in the process. If meaning can be added can meaning be subtracted as well? Definitely this seems to be the case as well. How does this apply to the fitoprocess? The meaning of the process of a nerve firing can change with the changes in the system.