Ch14 corivit.expri intro 7
More actions
File name ch14cori/vit.ex/pri intro File created date 10:41 pm Sunday, May 11 2008
Vitomultiactual Vitomultipostpotential Vitomultiprepotential
Vitomultipotential The multimaterilist MMT says that we are more than the current singular awaremoment. There is multiple potential that can be multiactual
sequential nonsequential progressive regressive cyclic
The relation ship of a coriginal to it’s videntireplica is the same as the relationship of the original to its cidentireplica. The videntireplica is the cidentireplica of the coriginal.
The relationship of a idcoriginal to it’s coriginal is the same as the relationship of the original to it’s idoriginal.
The relationship of the original to it’s coriginal is the same as the relationship of the cidentireplica to it’s vidientireplica.
The word “uxperiencit” is pronounced “you experience it”.
The english language uses the word “you” as both a singular plural pronoun. So the term you expereince it can be you as one or you as many experience. A very convient coincidence when dealing with this theory.
You experience it with a perspective type difference from the original. sequencial type difference it is happening in a difference sequence speed type difference you are experiencing it with a different speed of happening enhancement or reduction type difference you are experiencing with an enhancement in consciousness
This chapter deals with changes to structure and functioning of the original that produce changes in consciousness but where if this variation exists you will still experience it (uxperiencit) If you were reading this sentence in a park, the bathroom, in the kitchen of a friends house, on the beach in Hawaii, in outer space there would be differences in how your brain functioned and a change in its structure and a change in what you experienced but you would still experience it
If the ixperiencit concept only exists as a part of consciousness, and if we have identical consciousness we have identical ixperiecit. If we have a slight variation in consciousness we might still have the same ixpereincit or a slight variation of it. If the ixperiencit changes with consciousness, which it appears to do in level and intensity, if not many other conscious aspects, over time, having the identical ixperiencit over time is not a necessary requirement for expereincing what other people experience -- life after death --immortality. What ever is you in what you expereince now is also in any identical consciousness and
If the ixperiencit is not uniform over time then it is changing and or cyclying between different stages. This implys that this cyclying changing system can be applyed in a differnt sequence over laping the same or a differnt sequence of sensepaths enviropath etc. And it would still be considered by you to be you because it would still have you as the center of experience.
Definitions:
Coriginal: A coriginal is a conceivable original. This is a term that means all the possible changes we can imagine to the original’s awarepath that either maintains the same consciousness or ixperiencit. At this very moment you can imagine your consciousness experiencing many different sensepaths. Even though we exist at one actual awaremoment and think that we have had one awarepath that we developed from and we beleieve was our actual awarepath, there are actually many different awarepaths that do converge on this awaremoment. The one we believed was ours may not be even close because memories are so inexact. If in fact you were created this very moment there will not have been an awarepath that you developed from at all. As there is not one unique awarepath that we have developed from there are also a tremondous amount of awarepaths that we could expereince in the future. So we can imagine changes to our past present and future awarepaths. We can imagine many things that we could have done could be doing or will do in the future. These are all examples of awarepaths of coriginals
Icoriginal: The icoriginal relation to the the coriginal is the same as the relationship between idoriginal is to the original. The icoriginal is an actual naturally or “god” produced identical coriginal. The concept of the icoriginal solves the problem of how the videntireplica is made or the problem creation. It will or would have been made naturally or by gods.
You can talk about impossible things mathematically and or scientifically. Can you talk about unimaginable things this way? What about partially unimaginable. What about the concept of infinity? We have some concept of it? Or what about the color of infrared light? There is a difference between can not be imagined and has not been imagined.
Videntireplica: is the term for a physical variation to the original or cidentireplica. There are an extremely large amount of different variations that can occur to the original or a cidentireplica. Videntireplicas deals with the differences to consciousness produced by differences in the structure and functioning. For any coriginal there can be any number of videntireplicas that produce the same consciousness.
The videntireplica is a variation on structure and functioning on the original or cidentireplica that produces the consciousness that is (imagined, envisionsed, possible) in the coriginal.
The concept of videntireplicas solves the problem of the fact that the original is so complex that there will never be a cidentireplica of it so this type of life after death is nearly impossible. If the videntireplica can have the same uxperiencit as the cidentireplica
There maybe many awarepaths that we can imagine that we can not be created by videntireplicas And there may be many awarepaths that we can not imagined that can be produced by videntireplicas. The sets of awarepaths are differnt but overlap. On one hand you are changing the structure and functioning of the original and on the other hand you are making variation to the actual consciusness of the original.
The coriginal tells us what we can expereince. The videntireplica gives us a way to make it. And mapping of the two types of continuums simplifys the complexity.
Vitoawarepath: The term for the awarepath of the videntireplica.
Vitophysipath: The term for the physipath of the videntireplica.
Coriawarepath: The term for the awarepath of the coriginal.
Coriphysipath: The term for the physipath of the coriginal.
Icoriawarepath: The term for the awarepath of the icoriginal.
Icoriphysipath: The term for the physipath of the icoriginal.
The oriprinciples, idoprinciples, and citoprinciples apply to coriginal, icoriginals and videntireplicas. To save space they will not be set up like experiments. With a little imagination they can be imagined as experiments. What we will have, are definitions, subjective examples, and principles. They will follow the same order as did the oriprinciples and citoprinciples. We will call these coriprinciples, icoriprinciples, and vitoprinciples.
For every coriginal there exists a relationship with videntireplicas that is the same as the relations between originals and cidentireplicas. The coriginal is an potential conceivable variation of the original. The videntireplica is a cidentireplica of this coriginal. An icoriginal plays the same role for the coriginal as the idoriginal does for the original.
For every original there are many possible different coriginals, icoriginals, and videntireplicas.
For simplicity sake the discussions for Icoriginals can be left out.
Fundamental theory of videntireplicas
Generally, the closer the physical functioning and structure of the videntireplica is to that of the original / cidentireplica the closer the behavior consciousness will be to that original/ cidentireplica. And conversely, generally, the closer the behavior, consciousness, and ixperiencit of the videntireplica is to that of the original/ cidentireplica the closer the physical functioning and structure will be to that original/ cidentireplica. The exceptions are in transformations, fragmentation and critical functional points where divergence is drastic with small change. And in changes in structure functioning of the system that in combination produce convergence rather than divergence.
The coriginal is about changes that we can imagine occuring to the original’s awarepath where as the videntireplica is the change to the physipath that produces these awarepaths. There maybe awarepaths that we can imagine that can never be produced in the form of a physipath
Types of divergence: functioning, structure, consciousness, behavior, ixperiencit
External source of divergence: sensepath, externapath Internal source of divergence: Qm path
The concept of the coriginal will deal with the variation in consciousness from that of the original.
We are no longer talking about one physipath and one awarepath of the original we are now talking about all the variations that can occur to the original that the original will or would have expereinced if this would have happened to the original.
What happens to the consciousness and ixperiencit when we vary the structure and functioning of the cidentireplica? What happens to the original when if its structure and functioning was diiferent than it was, is or will be? Will the original still expereince it.
Type of immortality /Difference in theories:
SST, CST, These theories usually require a singular soul like concept with out this it is not you. Some versions of this theory might propose that videntireplicas are not even conscious. For the videntireplica to be a case of survival for you the soul would have to leave the original and combine with the videntireplica
NST, There is nothing that is uniquely you in the original in the first place so in a sense a videntireplica could be as much you as the original. But it is no more a case of survival as the original is for you because the original is so variable --multiactual. Because there is a uniting of you after death with the one universal consciousness there is in a sense a beyond the body -- supernatural -- soul like entity that ties the self together.
SMT, Videntireplica and coriginals are usually not considered a case of survival for the original. Especially if the original is still alive. And after death the singularity that is you is gone never to exist again. Generally there is no survival of death for these theories The only immortality is keeping the person alive for ever. The cryno body people believe that even though the body might be dead it is really is a state where it is unconscious and that consciousness can be revived. Why not revived as a healthy cidentireplica? Because of the near impossibility of creating an exact cidentireplica.
MMT: Many videntireplicas and coriginal of the original will have the same ixperiencit as the original so in this theory they will be a case of survival for the original and a type of survival of death and immortality for the original. Most of these types of immortality will apply to only the this theory.
Corimultiactual
Discussion: We can imagine numerous changes to the original’s awarepath that could exist at the same time as the original does.
Question(s):
Definition: Corimultiactual is the term fo the concept that concieveable originals are multiactual.
Experiment set #Corimultiactual: Since there are numerous variations to what we can imagine as versions of our awarepaths, each possible variation can be studied. But every one does not have to be studied all we need to find is one different awaremoment that has the same consciousness or ixperiencit. If you find a case where a coriginal does not have the same ixperiencit does this disprove the mmt? No because it does not say that all awarepaths will have the same ixperiencit. One proves multiplicity and disproves singularity theories.
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Corimultiactual:Coriginal can have identical consciousness to that of the original. If the consciousness of the coriginal is different from that of the original’s they can still have the same ixperiencit.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT:
SST: CST: NST: SMT: Because of the singularity condition of soul and body these will not be case of survival for the original.
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Corimultiactual: Many different movies called “your life” can be actually running at the same time. They will be producing many different actual moments of versions of your consciousness each with your ixperiencit.
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: what will you experience if there are all these other actual awaremoments that are versions of your self. You will actually experience all of them but form each limited perspective you will experience one perspective.
Why/how Important?:
Vitomultiactual
Discussion: There are many physical changes that we can make to the original structure and functionng of the physipath of the original.
Question(s):
Definition: Vitomultiactual is the term for the concept
Experiment set #Vitomultiactual:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories: If a videntireplica does not repeat the same awaremoments it is multiactual.
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: A videntireplica is a physipath version of an original.
Principle of Vitomultiactual:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT:
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Vitomultiactual:
Subjective example: A videntireplica can be a version of you where all the awaremoment are the same but the sequence that they occur can be differnt
Why/how Important?:
Corimultipostpotential
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Coripotentiality Corimultipostpotential is the term fo the concept
Experiment set# Corimultipotential
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Corimultipostpotential :
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Corimultipostpotential:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Vitomultipostpotential
Question(s):
Definition: Vitopotentiality Vitomultipostpotential is the term fo the concept
Experiment set# Vitomultipostpotential:
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Vitomultipostpotential: For every videntireplica there are many differnt physipaths and their awarepaths that could have lead up to the videntireplica’s current awaremoment.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT:
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Vitomultipostpotential: For every point on any movie variation of “Your life” there are numerous other possible beginings. When we watch a movie once and try to remember what happened in that movie we do not usually get it exactly correct. It is the same way with out memory of our past life
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Corimultiprepotential
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Corimultiprepotential is the term for the concept.
Experiment set Corimultiprepotential:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Corimultiprepotential: There are numerous awarepaths that can lead to any originals present actual awaremoment. There are many differnt awarepaths that could have produced and preceeded each originals current physimoment/ awaremoment.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Corimultiprepotential:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Vitomultiprepotential
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Vitomultiprepotential is the term for the concept that there are many possible prephysipaths that could have lead to this awaremoment for you.
Experiment set Vitomultiprepotential:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: Obiviously the sumation of all your expereinces and things that have effected you is what bring you to this awaremoment. But these differnt expereinces and event can replace and cancel out other the variations.
Principle of Vitomultiprepotential: There are many differnt physipaths that could have produced and preceeded your current physimoment/ awaremoment.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT:
SST: CST: NST: SMT: They could have been part of your awarepath but once it has happened it can not happen again once you are dead.
MMT: All coriginal are Cases of conscious existence Cce
CAM/VT analogy Vitomultiprepotential: For any point on a movie there are numerous possible different coherent versions that could have proceeded it.
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:v When you were five years old, rather than eating dinner at 5 PM with steak and pototoes, You could have eaten at 604 pm pizza. This change in you life will not make any differnt to what awaremoment you are expereincing now or will ever expereince in the future. There are numerous possible examples of a change in your past that does not effect your present awaremoment.
Why/how Important?: