Ch11oricit.expri.fragmen11
More actions
File name ch11ori/cit.ex/pri.fragmen File created date 01:45 pm Sunday, May 25 2008
Citofragmentation Citoepifragmentation Citoranfragmentation Citomultisharing Citomultiplex Citotransmultiplex Citosupermultiplex Citoawareunification Citophysiunification Citosuperunification
Awarethread: A theme that connects awarepaths they can be simple to complex like a reality. It can be a person or person object or objects feelings like
There are minor threads and major threads for example a person that walk out side your window that you will never see again that is a minor thread it passes through several awaremoments the effect it has might remain longer or you may never think of it again, On the other hand your loved ones may be in your physical view often and for long periods of time and thoughts about them might be in many other awaremoments. Awarethreads can be intermittent like dreams where you redream the same things. Or objects or people comming in and out of your vision -- sensepath. You are not tied to any particular awarethread. Your sensepath can totally change where there are no continuing aware threads in the sensepath. But in fact there are continuing awarethreads in any sensepath such as colors sounds feelings emotions smells tastes etc. Awarethreads are continued in experiences of memories etc.
Physithread: The physical structure and functioning that produces the awarethread. It may be easier to deconstruct the physithread; what does it take to get ride of this awarethread in terms of changes to the physipath
Discussion: The ideas in this chapter are at best very speculative. But the possible consequences make the effort of contemplation, study, and future experimentation well worth it. As has happened so many times in the past, information from experiments that we though could never be done, scientists have found very ingenious ways of finding.
Orifragmentation
Question(s): If changes are made to the original such that the parts of the brain are divided but all the parts of the original brain function identically to the original unfragmented brain will the awarepath be the same as the awarepath of the undivided brain?
Definition: Orifragmentation deals with what happens to the consciousness and ixperiencit when different types of fragmentation occurs to the body and brain of the original.
Experiment set #Orifragmentation:
Experiment type 1: In this experiment we take one part of the originals brain and separate it at any distance from the rest of the original’s body but connected it with electronics and other adaptive devices so that the parts function like the original would have functioned if this division had not have happened. If it produces the same awarepath and ixperiencit you can do the next experiment. If this type of fragmentation can not produce a consciousness identical to that of the original’s can it none the less produce a consciousness at the same level of complexity?
Experiment type 2: In this experiment you divide the brain into any number of pieces connecting each part to each other part so that all the parts function like they would if they were in one original brain. If the behavior is not the same we know that we have not accomplished identical functioning in the original brain
What ever the outcome of these experiments they will tell us a lot about what we are!
Types of experiments separating 1 to n number of neurons
separating the brain from the body but connecting the
dividing the brain into two parts but maintaining their connection exactly changing distance and orientation
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories: Each level of experiment The first thing that is obvious is that the consciousness produced by one brain in two large parts will not be the same as the same brain together unless all other things are equal and the two brain communicate as if they are connected.
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: A brain that has a large enough part removed will show mental deficiencies because that brain section is no longer processing information and relaying this information to the rest of the brain. But if they are separated but connected so it is correctly communicating then there will not be these deficiencies in behavior and consciousness. There is one key idea and that is that when this happens we can never exactly duplicate the functioning when separated so a consciousness is formed but it is a different one than that of the originals. But if we consider that small changes
Principle of Orifragmentation: Some types of fragmentation of the original will maintain identical consciousness.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories:SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy: The camcorder and VT could be divided into parts in such a way that they still communicate to produce the same out put to the tv. So the movie the originals life is still exactly the same.
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: The extreme example of this is that you are not really reading this book even though you are experiencing reading this book. The awarepath that you are experiencing is produced by an unconnected set of neurons that exist in hundred of billions of other nervous systems through space and time.
Why/how Important?: It increases the amount of ways the universe can create the awarepath of an original -- it increases the DMF for the original.
Citofragmentation
Question(s): Under what conditions do fragmented conscious producing systems (physipaths) produce the same consciousness and ixperiencit as the unfragmented system? If any type of fragmented system does not produce an identical consciousness or any consciousness, why?
Definition: Citofragmentation deals with what happens to the consciousness and ixperiencit when different types of fragmentation occurs to the body and brain of the cidentireplica.
Experiment set #Citofragmentation: same experiments as the orifragmentation examples but we can repeat the experiments with very small changes in the conditions.
With cidentireplica we can start with one neuron and see if the same consciousness is produced then two three... Then we can see if the brain without the neuron will produce
Changing the amount of parts the brain is broken into
Changing from identical communication of connections to preknowledge
Random existence of parts functioning identically
We can add a different type of experiment with cidentireplicas
Experiment type 6: If we consider the situation of hundred of billions of neural systems (people, animals, aliens) producing one to several identically neurons to produce the sum total of the correct consciousness the problem is that these neurons are not likely to continue to function in the correct way for extended periods of time so even if this were to happen the identical consciousness or awarepath produced would be very short. This can be over come if some where else in another body some other neuron takes the place of this neuron
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:If any of these experiments produce consciousnesses the universe becomes a much more productive place when it comes to producing awarepaths. SST: SMT: NST:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: These experiments can be carried out so gradually with cidentireplicas it is hard to see where and why consciousness would not be produced. At each level of these experiments there may be empirical reasons that identical or any consciousness is produced.
Principle of Citofragmentation: Understanding the different types of fragmentation that produce the same consciousness and /or ixperiencit gives us an understanding of nature of consciousness and ixperiencit.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: You experiencing reading this sentence might be created by billions of beings that have nervous systems spread out through space and time. You have no real ability to change the world but your awarepath and ixperiencit is just as real as the one that is directly connected to what you think is reality.
Why/how Important?:
Oriepifragmentation
Discussion: The prefix “epi” is short for episteme which is the word for knowledge in greek language.
Question(s):
Definition: Oriepifragmentation is the term for the concept of the original’s consciousness being produced by the process of preknowledge of exact or necessary conditions, structure, and functioning.
Experiment set Oriepifragmentation: Experiment type1: In this experiment we eliminate the connections but keep all the parts functioning as if they were connected. This requires preknowledge of how the original’s brain is supposed to behave. This experiment does not have to run for very long because the amount of knowledge required and
Experiment type 2: Here we eliminate the other portion-s and simply stimulate the remaining brain in the correct way.
Experiment type 4: If we imagine the situation where there exists these portions of brains, it can be even all individual neurons, we can fin
Experiment type 5: If fragmentation through space can produce an original awarepath can fragmentation through time do the same thing? If not this can it produce a complex human like consciousness?
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Oriepifragmentation:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Oriepifragmentation:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citoepifragmentation
Discussion: These types of experiments actually get down to the actual requirements for consciousness. What are the requirements for togetherness, connectiveness, precision of functioning and structure, preknowledge, and simultaneousness?
Question(s):
Definition: Citoepifragmentation is the term for the concept of cidentireplicas consciousness being produced by the process of preknowledge of functioning.
Experiment set Citoepifragmentation: With cidentireplicas the experiment can be run over and over changing external variables changing the original etc.
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories: Some of these experiments might not have obvious rational answers. If behavior is our only clue we can totally eliminate the functioning brain and replace it with preknowledge brain or a transformational brain each giving the same answers to the question or same behavior.
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citoepifragmentation:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citoepifragmentation:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Oriranfragmentation
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Oriranfragmentation is the term for the concept for the original’s consciousness being produced by a combination of random combinations of fragmentation.
Experiment set Oriranfragmentation:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Oriranfragmentation:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Oriranfragmentation:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: This process if it actually exists, can if enough physipaths exists, greatly increase the number and variety of awarepaths produced. It makes a universe full of consciousness beings a super awarepaducer.
Citoranfragmentation
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Citoranfragmentation is the term for the concept of the consciousness of a cidentireplica being produced by random fragmentation
Experiment set Citoranfragmentation:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citoranfragmentation:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citoranfragmentation:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: The consciousness that you experience now could be created by a number of random parts of brains separated in space and possible time. so if things get a little weird don’t worry it just the parts are not synchronized. And the reality that you think is real is not but might be somewhere else so enjoy.
Why/how Important?:
Fitoseprocess: Consciousness produced by separation and communication of brain parts. Fitoepiprocess: Consciousness produced by separation and preknowledge creating identical functioning of brain parts. Fitoranprocess: Consciousness produced by separation and random but identical functioning of brain parts.
Orimultisharing
Discussion: Imagine taking an original and a cidentireplica of that original through the fito process you have them share parts of each others brain if the functioning is the same what will the consciousness be?
Question(s): If this is possible how do you count the number of identical awarepaths produced?
Definition: Orimultisharing is the term for parts of a physipath being used to produce more than one awarepath. One or more parts of the original brain could be connected to the cidentireplica brain that does not contain these parts as long as they are functioning identically will they produce the same consciousness?
Experiment set Orimultisharing:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orimultisharing:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Orimultisharing:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citomultisharing
Discussion:
Question(s): can one part be used for several
Definition: Citomultisharing is the term for one part of a consciousness producing system connected to
Experiment set Citomultisharing:imagine two brains that are functioning identically we remove a part of one and have the
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citomultisharing:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citomultisharing:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: A cidentireplica brain might be producing part of your consciousness as well as the original
Why/how Important?:
Orimultiplex
?Multiplex principle One section can apply to many different itopath paths
?Orimultiplex is a citomanifold where every section is used in at least two different itopaths
Discussion: The concept from extreme fidentireplicas a large enough grouping would produce as a whole many possible awarepaths. a grouping of physipaths through the fitiprocess can produce awarepaths
Question(s): Can the fitoprocess and sharing process be combined to produce the awarepath of the original?
Definition: Orimultiplex is the term for where the original is produced by a multiplex of fragmented conscious producing systems
Experiment set Orimultiplex: If the fragmentation process and sharing process can actually produce a consciousness it might produce many different consciousness at the same time. What would be the smallest and simplest experimental set? Two brains that not connected. How can you actually find empirical evidence for the consciousness that is produced
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orimultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT: If orimultiplexing actually exists then the duplication of the awarepath of the original is much more likely to exist again because many more possible consciousness could be produced.
CAM/VT analogy Orimultiplex:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: The awarepath that you are experiencing now may not be produced by the body that you think is producing it. It could be produced by numerous fragmented parts spread out through space and maybe time. Your consciousness and ixperiencit is not having the effect on reality that you think there is really no body that is changing realty like you think. Not only is it fragmented but it can be jumping around producing a little bit here and a little bit there
Why/how Important?:
Citomultiplex
Discussion: CitoMultiplexing where one section of an awarepath or physipath is used more than one awarepath to make a longer or different itopath
Question(s):
Definition: Citomultiplex is the term for is developed by the extreme citofragmentation where every possible fitoawarepath is produced from the grouping of fitophysipaths?
Experiment set Citomultiplex:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of CitoMultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy CitoMultiplex:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Oritransmultiplex
Transformational Orimultiplex
Discussion: This concept combines the concepts of oritranformation and orimultiplex.
Question(s): Can a Transformational Orimultiplex exist? If it does will it produce multiple copies of an originals awarepath?
Definition: Oritransmultiplex is the term for the combination of the concepts of oritranformation and orimultiplex.
Experiment set Oritransmultiplex:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Oritransmultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Oritransmultiplex:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citotransmultiplex
Transformational Citomultiplex
Discussion: This concept combines the concepts of citotranformation and citomultiplex.
Question(s):
Definition: Citotransmultiplex is the term for
Experiment set Citotransmultiplex:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citotransmultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citotransmultiplex:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Orisupermultiplex
Discussion:
Question(s): Can the concepts of orimultiplex be combined with the concept of orienhancement? Are there limits to this combination? If so what are these limits?
Definition: Orisupermultiplex is the term for that combines the concepts of orimultiplexing and orienhancement to that of the original.
Experiment set Orisupermultiplex:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orisupermultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Orisupermultiplex:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: The supermultiplex process might be a way to produce super or god like consciousnesses and ixperiencits.
Citosupermultiplex
Discussion:
Question(s): Do we have a universe that can produce citosupermultiplexes? Are there any universes that can? What are the conditions that allow or do not allow this?
Definition: Citosupermultiplex is the term for combining the concept of citomultiplex and citoenhancement.
Experiment set Citosupermultiplex:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: We are combining the concepts of cidentireplicas, enhancement, fragmentation, and multiplexing. All four must work and work together to some extent for this concept to work.
Principle of Citosupermultiplex:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT:
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citosupermultiplex:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: Imagine all of a sudden having god like knowledge and consciousness. Even though you may have very limited ability to do things you may not know this. You may all of a sudden think that you do have these extra ordinary abilities to control the world around and experience these events.
Why/how Important?: It increases the likely hood of a superawarepath of the original existing.
Conscious control over ones environment or control over ones experiences.
You are not likely to have conscious control of you consciousness but will you be aware of it. Since it is pure awarepath and no interaction to a environment to control the sensepath what will it actually experience?
Will disjointed awarepaths produced by continuous “fito”physipaths organize into a continuous awarepaths from the point of view of the observer?
Some maybe most awarepaths/ awaremoments have self organizing properties. What is a self organizing property? Certain sets of future and past awarepath stick together or coherently fit together for instance what you might have just experienced you have no memory but you do have memory of other memories so you thing that certain experiences can before so you expect these possible set of previous awarepath to have existed they fit with your current awarepath even if they never occurred or will in the future
from an external view point a physipath could produce many different awaremoments but if you have no memory of the previous awaremoment it does not
If you create a bunch of randomly generated awaremoments the ones that are connected will form a apparent to the awaremoment continuous awarepath. The apparent continuous awarepath can be a crazy one where it thinks that it is discontinuous but only because it will have the awaremoment that has these memories of this discontinuousness.
Not only people and higher life forms could add to this process but also animal neurons might add to this as well. If any consciousness is produced by insects the fitoprocess might apply to them because there are so many more of them than people and that they have a much simpler nervous system so it is easier to generate
Oriawarepath unification Oriawareunification
Discussion: If multiplexing actually exists it is not likely to produce a nice continuous in order stream of unified awaremoments that fit into an in order and continuous in time awarepath.
Question(s): If a multiplexing physipaducer is creating random awaremoments what will the original experience?
Definition: Oriawareunification is the term for the concept of
Experiment set Oriawareunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Oriawareunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT:
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Oriawareunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: Increases the DMF by increasing the number of ways that awarepaths of the original can be produced.
Citoawarepath unification
Citoawareunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Citoawareunification is the term for the concept of
Experiment set Citoawareunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citoawareunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citoawareunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: A multiplexing physipaducer would be combining the consciousness produced by many other conscious producing systems. It would be producing many different awaremoments that are not connected by one awarepath what you would be experiencing is reading this sentence but you would have no control over your environment and would not know it what you experience this moment is not the cause of what you experience in the next moment.
Why/how Important?: Increases the DMF by increasing the number of ways that awarepaths of the originals can be produced.
Coriawarepath unification Coriawareunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Coriawareunification is the term for the concept of
Experiment set Coriawareunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Coriawareunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Coriawareunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Vitoawarepath unification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: is the term for the concept of
Experiment set:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Oriphysipath unification Oriphysiunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: is the term for the concept of
Experiment set:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citophysipath unification
Citophysiunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: is the term for the concept of
Experiment set:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Coriphysipath unification
Coriphysiunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Coriphysiunification is the term for the concept of
Experiment set Coriphysiunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Coriphysiunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Coriphysiunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Vitophysipath unification Vitophysiunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: is the term for the concept of
Experiment set:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Enumeration says that there are more unique awaremoments for a superpath than for lessor paths unification says that there is more specific unification for superpaths than for lessor paths. So even though there are more paths there is a more exacting unification. Does that mean that there will be less possible divergence and convergence of awarepaths? There should be more. How can this be the case?
Proof of superunification: There can be more awarethreads in a superpath thus it can be more specific to connect all of these threads. If there are no awarethreads then it is pure experience of the moment with no memories goals no awareness of self etc.
Orisuperunification
Discussion: A lot of what ties together awaremoments is a reality that we create because we have a bigger brain. This reality has many advantages it allows us to control and maximize our environment allowing us to survive. If we predict wrong we suffer and maybe do not survive to reproduce better. An orisuperpath can have a much better sense of his reality than a lessor being. Lower level animals with smaller neural processors do not have the capacity to learn about their environment and then modify their behaviors as much as a humans can. This reality of knowledge, goals, environment, people we know, is specific but can be much more specific and of a wider range for a superpath
Question(s):
Definition: Orisuperunification is the term for the combination of the concepts orisuperpaths, and unification.
Experiment set Orisuperunification: For there actually to be experiments about this concept there has to be a ways to produce random superawaremoments. If originals can be produced by tranformational physipaths that can actually produce random awaremoments or awaresections then experiment can be carried out
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orisuperunification: there exists more aware threads for an superoriginal that for lessor conscious beings because of this even though there are many more possible unique superawaremoments there not be as large of an increase in continuous connecting superawaremoments. Is this concept really true?
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Orisuperunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: It is a concept that organizes random superawaremoments into an apparent, coherent, continuous superawarepath.
Citosuperunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Citosuperunification is the term for the combination of the concepts citosuperpaths, and unification.
Experiment set:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Corisuperunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Corisuperunification is the term for the combination of the concepts corisuperpaths, and unification.
Experiment set Corisuperunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Corisuperunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Corisuperunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Vitosuperunification
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Vitosuperunification is the term for the combination of the concepts Vitosuperpaths, and unification.
Experiment set Vitosuperunification:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Vitosuperunification:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Vitosuperunification:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: