Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Life After Death Atheist Experience: Difference between revisions

From Aware Theory
Mark (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Either we have an after life or we do not is a passive way of looking at life after death. We do not want to be passive when it comes to achieving a life or lives after death...."
 
Mark (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


[[Superimmortality]] is not a post modern belief system where every belief is true. Very few beliefs about life after death that have been developed by humans over their history are correct. Superimmortality based on the [[science of superimmortality]] may be the closest theory to being true so far developed. Since the science of superimmortality deals with every possible consciousness that can exist and how to produce them, it will deal with how to produce any belief about any possible imaginable theory of the after life, life after death or immortality.  The ability to produce any belief system in a conscious being is not the same as letting any or all belief systems control society and reality. Knowledge, the pursuit of more knowledge, the use of knowledge to create positive things and positive consciousnesses need to be the controlling factors for a society. The fear of knowledge, the fear of the pursuit of more knowledge, that many religious and other belief system propagate are the antithesis of what superimmortality is trying to achieve. The more we know the more likely you are to consciously exist again after your death. Religious and other belief systems that do not believe in the value of knowledge and it pursuit decrease the probability that any one will consciously exist again after death.
[[Superimmortality]] is not a post modern belief system where every belief is true. Very few beliefs about life after death that have been developed by humans over their history are correct. Superimmortality based on the [[science of superimmortality]] may be the closest theory to being true so far developed. Since the science of superimmortality deals with every possible consciousness that can exist and how to produce them, it will deal with how to produce any belief about any possible imaginable theory of the after life, life after death or immortality.  The ability to produce any belief system in a conscious being is not the same as letting any or all belief systems control society and reality. Knowledge, the pursuit of more knowledge, the use of knowledge to create positive things and positive consciousnesses need to be the controlling factors for a society. The fear of knowledge, the fear of the pursuit of more knowledge, that many religious and other belief system propagate are the antithesis of what superimmortality is trying to achieve. The more we know the more likely you are to consciously exist again after your death. Religious and other belief systems that do not believe in the value of knowledge and it pursuit decrease the probability that any one will consciously exist again after death.
Matt says that in many cases we should be able to figure out what is more likely when a statement is made
Matt says that the statement: "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is not always true. He gives the example of the cat in the truck of a car if there is no evidence of a cat in the truck of a car then this does give us evidence that there is evidence of absence.
The [[cat in the truck argument for cidentireplicas]]

Revision as of 21:37, 10 July 2016

Either we have an after life or we do not is a passive way of looking at life after death. We do not want to be passive when it comes to achieving a life or lives after death. We often want, and most people seem to believe, that there is something that we can do to improve our chances of achieving an after death life. This is why many people are religious because it gives them something to work toward in this life time. If you do x, y, and z you will go to heaven. Or another example is If you are mummified and placed in a pyramid that you have built etc., you will have an after life. There are all sorts of rituals that cultures has to achieve some form of life after death. In this clip from the Atheist Experience https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEWztlIteo4, they say there is either an after life or not but there is no evidence that there is an after life so the rational thing to do is to make the most of this life. If there were evidence that certain sets of behaviors producing specific accomplishments increases the likelihood of an after life it might be worth sacrificing some of the better aspects of this life to achieve it. But since there have been proposed numerous ways of producing an afterlife for a person and no proof, why should we waste the one life we have chasing an illusion of an after life?

There is extraordinary evidence for superimmortality. People are superimmortal whether they know it or not. Superimmortality does not guarantee conscious existence for every person after death. It does however show how it is possible and what you can do to increase the possibility of it occurring. The evidence that the universe is so big and can last so long adds to the probability of consciously existing again. Knowing how and having many different way to create a consciousness that you will experience again after death also increases the probability of consciously existing again after death.

Superimmortality is not a post modern belief system where every belief is true. Very few beliefs about life after death that have been developed by humans over their history are correct. Superimmortality based on the science of superimmortality may be the closest theory to being true so far developed. Since the science of superimmortality deals with every possible consciousness that can exist and how to produce them, it will deal with how to produce any belief about any possible imaginable theory of the after life, life after death or immortality. The ability to produce any belief system in a conscious being is not the same as letting any or all belief systems control society and reality. Knowledge, the pursuit of more knowledge, the use of knowledge to create positive things and positive consciousnesses need to be the controlling factors for a society. The fear of knowledge, the fear of the pursuit of more knowledge, that many religious and other belief system propagate are the antithesis of what superimmortality is trying to achieve. The more we know the more likely you are to consciously exist again after your death. Religious and other belief systems that do not believe in the value of knowledge and it pursuit decrease the probability that any one will consciously exist again after death.

Matt says that in many cases we should be able to figure out what is more likely when a statement is made

Matt says that the statement: "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is not always true. He gives the example of the cat in the truck of a car if there is no evidence of a cat in the truck of a car then this does give us evidence that there is evidence of absence.

The cat in the truck argument for cidentireplicas