Ixperiencitness mapping proof: Difference between revisions
More actions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Ixperiencitness mapping proof]] is the proof that the [[ixperiencitness]] concept can be mapped or connected to [[physapath]]s and [[awarepath]]s. The proof does not give a number to the amount of physapaths and awarepaths have the same [[ixperiencitness]]. It is also not an [[existence proof]] for different [[ixperiencitness]]es. | The [[Ixperiencitness mapping proof]] is the proof that the [[ixperiencitness]] concept can be mapped or connected to [[physapath]]s and [[awarepath]]s. The proof does not give a number to the amount of physapaths and awarepaths have the same [[ixperiencitness]]. It is also not an [[existence proof]] for different [[ixperiencitness]]es. It is not a proof that every [[physapath]] produces an [[ixpepath]]. it is not a proof that a physapath produces only one ixpepath. | ||
it is a proof that a connection can be made between one [[awarepath]] and one [[ixpepath]] where the connection or relationship is the awarepath has this ixpepath and not other ixpepaths. In the case of the a physapath it is one physapath producing a specific [[ixpepath]] or set of ixpepaths. The specific relationship may not be exist in all universes with different sets of physical laws. For instance, in a different universe with different physical laws a physapath in this universe might not produce the same or any [[ixpepath]]. | |||
[[Awarepath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an awarepath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
[[Awarepath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an awarepath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
[[Physapath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an physapath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
[[Physapath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an physapath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
[[Physipath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an physipath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
[[Physipath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof]] is the proof that an physipath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the [[itopath]]. | |||
Latest revision as of 21:49, 27 December 2013
The Ixperiencitness mapping proof is the proof that the ixperiencitness concept can be mapped or connected to physapaths and awarepaths. The proof does not give a number to the amount of physapaths and awarepaths have the same ixperiencitness. It is also not an existence proof for different ixperiencitnesses. It is not a proof that every physapath produces an ixpepath. it is not a proof that a physapath produces only one ixpepath.
it is a proof that a connection can be made between one awarepath and one ixpepath where the connection or relationship is the awarepath has this ixpepath and not other ixpepaths. In the case of the a physapath it is one physapath producing a specific ixpepath or set of ixpepaths. The specific relationship may not be exist in all universes with different sets of physical laws. For instance, in a different universe with different physical laws a physapath in this universe might not produce the same or any ixpepath.
Awarepath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof is the proof that an awarepath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath. Awarepath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof is the proof that an awarepath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath.
Physapath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof is the proof that an physapath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath. Physapath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof is the proof that an physapath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath.
Physipath X Ixperiencitness Mapping Proof is the proof that an physipath can be mapped to a nonvariable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath. Physipath X Ixpepath Mapping Proof is the proof that an physipath can be mapped to a variable ixperiencitness for the length of the itopath.