View source for Ixperiencit simplicity mapping argument

A [[nonexistent theory of consciousness existence]] maps at best one[[ ixperiencit]] per [[awaremoment]]. And at worst an infinite amount of ixperiencits to each awaremoment. this creates an extremely complicated knowledge or epistemological structure. 

A [[singular theory of conscious existence]] can map an infinite amount of ixperiencits to each awarepath.

Multiplicity theory can be set up to map one ixperiencit to each [[awarepath]]. This make multiplicity much simpler and more useful.

The [[universality theory of conscious existence]] maps only one ixperiencit to all awarepaths. Universality theory is the simplest in terms of mapping but you loose usefulness and meaning in doing so.