Ixperiencitness degradation proof

Ixperiencitness degradation proof is supporting evidence for the fact that the ixperiencitness that people and other conscious beings experience can be degraded. The first part of the proof is that ixperiencitness exists. The second part of the proof is that ixperiencitness is a continuum concept which means it can change. Ixperiencitness is produced by the functioning of the brain which is based on its structure and the environmental conditions that effect it. The structure and functioning of the brain can change in many different ways. One way being increasing in complexity. Such as with more neurons, more connections between neurons, increasing the types of ways neurons can communicate. etc. The ixperiencitness concept has a sense of self existing in the present past and future. We can imagine an increase in these abilities as in clearer memories of past events, greater awareness of the body properties and appearance, a greater current awareness of ones surrounding, a greater understanding of complex ideas that are within the fields of mathematics, science, language, literature, music, etc.

If the ixperiencitness can be enhanced it was a less complex state before thus there are degraded states of ixperiencitness. We can also use the more direct proof that structure and functioning of matter that produces ixperiencitness can be imagined degraded at any speed to any other structure and functioning of matter. If we assume that not all structures and functioning of matter produce an ixperiencitness, we can imagine degrading the structure and functioning to a state where no ixperiencitness is produced. There will be a sequence of structures and functionings of matter from a ixperiencitness producing state to a structure and functioning of matter that does not produce any ixperiencitness. Unless there is one point where there is a complete step wise elimination of the ixperiencitness from the original state there will be at least one degraded state of structure and functioning producing a degraded ixperiencitness.

There is also the animal argument for existence of degraded ixperiencitnesses. It seems that animals have a degraded ixperiencitness from what human have on the average.

Another argument for degraded ixperiencitness is that of the person with the experience of a coma either naturally or medically induced, will go from being more aware through several stages or levels of consciousness and ixperiencitness to a state of not being aware, or conscious thus having no ixperiencitness.